48 Gambling Advise for that Experienced Casino player.

 While lots of the gambling facts you might have picked up in Las Vegas can be useful in online gambling it's essential that you realize there are some critical differences. But with a knowledge of the reality surrounding your chosen game, and armed with some gambling tips from experienced online players, you will see online gambling not really a fascinating and exciting adventure bit also an opportunity to turn your gambling hobby in to a profitable venture.

Critical Rules for Every Game

1. Never chase after your losses. Don't boost your bets because you're losing and would like to get even; only boost your bets included in a pre-determined strategy.
2. Don't gamble at any game that you don't understand. Learn it first.
3. Don't gamble and drink at the same. It's hard enough to win at gambling even without dulled senses.
Money Management - General Guidelines
4. You will lose more frequently than you win and the longer you play the more likely that fact is. And it's true whether you're speaing frankly about hands of blackjack, rolls of the roulette wheel or throws of the dice.
5. The key to winning is to maximize your wins and to minimize you losses.
6. Learn and memorize the odds at the particular game you've chosen to play along with the very best strategies to use in an attempt to maximize your winnings at that particular game.
7. Never gamble with "dear" money; only gamble with "excess" money. Put simply, never gamble with money that you will need, or may require, to pay your everyday living expenses.
8. If you're playing against other players online this is doubly important. The minute you begin gambling with "dear" money the other player will sense your heightened stress and play accordingly - often bullying you out of a bet simply because they know you are more tentative along with your "dear" money.
9. Set a stop loss amount and adhere to it. Divide your total gambling bankroll into four separate amounts. Divide each of those amounts into four smaller amounts. In the event that you lose one of many smaller amounts, change tables or games or just have a break. In the event that you lose your entire first allotment, stop gambling for the day.
10. Be disciplined and avoid the gambler's demise of going into the next allotment when you feel your luck "just has to turn around."
11. Plan ahead. Once you take up a gambling session determine the total amount that you want to win (be realistic) and when you reach that point put the money away and walk.
12. When you are winning, draw some cash occasionally from your gambling bankroll and use it in to a "do not touch" bankroll to safeguard that portion from further risk.
13. No money management system will ever overcome your house advantage over the long term. You will always lose more frequently than you win. The key is that you need to win more big bets and lose more small bets.

Money Management - Positive Progression Systems

14. A Positive Progression System is one in that you simply increase the quantity of your bets when you win and decrease the amounts of your bets when you lose. To make use of this technique properly you need to establish a "standard" betting unit.
15. Your "standard" betting unit should be a comfortable percentage of the gambling bankroll that you will be working with for a particular gambling session. For instance, if your session's bankroll is $100, you may make your "standard" betting unit $10.00. In this way you'd be able to play at the least 10 betting events before running out of funds even although you lost all 10 events in a row.
16. These systems allow you to win relatively large amounts during a warm streak while helping minimize your losses during cold streaks.
17. A typical example with this strategy is to include one-half of the amounts you win to the next bet. For instance, at blackjack if you win a hand along with your "standard" betting unit of $10.00 you'd add $5.00 to the bet on another hand for an overall total bet of $15.00. In the event that you win that hand you'd add $7.50 to the $15.00 for a bet of $22.50 on another hand. Once you eventually lose a hand, come back to your "standard" betting unit of $10.00 on another hand and start the device all over. Obviously used these increases of 50% will undoubtedly be approximate.
18. Another more difficult system is to keep your bankroll divided into a certain quantity of units and then bet one unit on each event. As you win, your total bankroll becomes bigger so each unit will grow and you'll be betting larger amounts. As you lose, your units, and bets, become smaller.
19. Set up a system for drawing a number of the winnings from your gambling bankroll occasionally to put it into your "do not touch" bankroll. For instance, when you double your bankroll you may take one-half of the winnings to put to the "do not touch" bankroll. If you feel an extended winning streak using a Positive Progression System the winnings can grow dramatically.

Money Management - Negative Progression Systems

20. A Negative Progression System is one in that you simply increase the quantity of your bets when you lose and decrease the amounts of your bets when you win. Again, to make use of this technique properly you need to establish your "standard" betting unit.
21. The most typical negative progression system is the Martingale System. Here you double the quantity of your bet if you lose and come back to your "standard" betting unit when you win. For instance, at blackjack if you bet $10.00 and lose you'd bet $20.00 on another hand. In the event that you win that hand you'd then reduce your bet to the "standard" $10.00 bet for the following hand. In most gambling, the Martingale system will always fail in the long run.
22. This method can be extremely frustrating because during a warm streak you are winning only your "standard" betting unit. And during cold streaks you are continually losing bigger and bigger amounts.
23. Remember, draw some cash occasionally from your gambling bankroll winnings and use it in to a "do not touch" bankroll.

Playing Roulette

24. American roulette is one of many worst casino games that you could play because your house advantage under standard rules is 5.26% or higher.
25. European roulette provides a lower house advantage under standard rules of 2.7% because there are fewer slots with only one "0" as opposed to the "0" and "00" in American roulette.
26. All bets on in American roulette give your house a benefit of 5.26% with one exception: the "0", "00", 1, 2, 3 combination bet gives your house a much larger 7.89% advantage.
27. All roulette betting systems depend on the inaccurate assumption that caused by previous spins can predict future results. Unless the device is defective or fixed, each spin carries the same odds as every other spin.
28. The most used betting system at roulette is the negative progression system known as Martingale (see #17). As in all other games, the Martingale found in roulette will always fail in the long run.
29. Due to the heavy house advantage if you should be playing not merely for amusement but to win money you might as well have a shot at the higher payoff bets and hope that you get lucky.
30. Here is another modified positive progression system at roulette. Divide the total amount you are willing to get rid of at one roulette session into 35 "standard" betting units. Select one number and bet one unit on that number (must be at the least equal to the table minimum bet). Continue playing one unit on that same number until you either win or run out of your 35 unit bankroll. In the event that you win, bet two units on a single number and continue betting two units on that number until you either win or lose your bankroll. In the event that you win again, disappear!
31. Roulette is really a relatively slow moving game compared to other online games, so it will get you an extended time to get rid of your bankroll.
32. Don't play roulette as a means to win money; the odds are overweight and only the house. Play roulette only as a means to have fun and pass the full time without losing a fortune quickly.

Playing Baccarat

33. Baccarat is one of many easiest casino games to play and provides a relatively low advantage to your house of just 1.06%.
34. There might be as much as 12 to 14 players at a desk, with the role as dealer passed across the table much because the dice are passed around a craps table.
35. All players may bet on each hand and the bets are either on the "player", on the "dealer" or on a tie. With the exception of the tie bet, baccarat is much like betting heads or tails on the flip of a coin.
36. Neither banker nor player could make any decisions regarding play; the guidelines of the game stipulate what must certanly be completed with every hand and a home "dealer" supervising the game will direct the play accordingly.
37. Winning bets on the player or the dealer both pay even money, minus a 5% commission paid either during the time of the bet or when the player leaves the table.
38. Winning bets on a tie usually pay 8 to 1, again minus a 5% commission.
39. In an 8-deck game, your house advantage is slightly less for a "banker bet" and dramatically higher for a "tie bet", so it seems most logical to bet only on the banker.
40. As in every online gambling, card counting is meaningless as the deck(s) is generally shuffled after every turn in baccarat.

Playing Blackjack

41. Blackjack offers one of many lowest house advantages at around .60%, but expert players can in fact create situations where the player has an advantage. interwin88

42. For the serious player there are numerous complex strategies that require time and dedication to master.
43. Never just sit back cold at a table. Blackjack tends to be a game title of streaks, so watch a desk for a few hands to ascertain when it is a warm or cold table for the players.
44. A "soft" hand is really a hand by having an Ace which can be counted as the 1 or an 11 in value and still keep carefully the hand's total at 21 or less.
45. A "hard" hand is really a hand by having an Ace that must definitely be counted as 1 in value in order to keep carefully the hand's total at 21 or less.
46. A beginning or social player should adhere to the generally accepted rules of the basic blackjack strategy.
47. Never be afraid to have a card that may bust you. Always play the odds; don't let the fear of a bust prevent you from having a card when you know it's the option with the highest possibility of success irrespective of how small that probability may be.
48. Read one of the numerous excellent books on counting cards if you should be intent on blackjack and willing to pay plenty of time practicing and perfecting your play. As in every online gambling, card counting is of little value as the deck(s) is generally shuffled after every hand. In blackjack, however, with many players at a desk it might be very theraputic for that certain hand

Politisi Ingin Melindungi Kami Dari Kejahatan Judi On-line.

 Itu adalah bagian 3 dari beberapa artikel tentang undang-undang anti-perjudian yang diusulkan. Dalam artikel informatif ini, saya melanjutkan diskusi tentang penyebab yang diklaim untuk membuat undang-undang ini diperlukan, dan kenyataan yang ada di dunia nyata, seperti koneksi Jack Abramoff dan sifat adiktif dari perjudian online. Para legislator ingin melindungi kita dari sesuatu, atau mereka? Semuanya tampaknya hanya sedikit membingungkan untuk dikatakan. Seperti disebutkan sebelumnya dalam artikel sebelumnya, DPR, dan Senat, sekali lagi mempertimbangkan masalah "Perjudian Online". RUU kini telah diajukan oleh Anggota Kongres Goodlatte dan Leach, dan juga oleh Senator Kyl. RUU yang diajukan oleh Rep. Goodlatte, Undang-Undang Larangan Perjudian Internet, menyatakan niat untuk memperbarui Undang-Undang Kawat untuk melarang semua bentuk perjudian online, untuk membuatnya ilegal bagi bisnis perjudian untuk menerima kredit dan transfer elektronik, dan untuk memaksa ISP dan Operator Umum untuk memblokir akses ke situs terkait perjudian atas permintaan penegak hukum. Dengan cara yang sama, Rep. Goodlatte, Sen. Kyl, dalam undang-undangnya, Larangan Pendanaan Perjudian Internet yang Melanggar Hukum, menyebabkan bisnis perjudian menerima kartu bank, transfer elektronik, cek, dan bentuk pembayaran lain untuk tujuan tersebut adalah ilegal. tentang menempatkan taruhan ilegal, tetapi tagihannya tidak membahas orang-orang yang memasang taruhan. RUU yang diajukan oleh Rep. 

Leach, Undang-Undang Penegakan Perjudian Internet Melanggar Hukum, sebenarnya adalah salinan dari RUU yang diajukan oleh Sen. Kyl. Ini berfokus untuk mencegah bisnis perjudian menerima kartu bank, transfer elektronik, cek, dan pembayaran lainnya, dan seperti halnya tagihan Kyl tidak membuat perubahan pada apa yang saat ini legal, atau ilegal. Dalam kutipan dari Goodlatte kami telah "Pengabaian total Jack Abramoff untuk proses legislatif telah memungkinkan perjudian internet untuk terus berkembang menjadi apa yang sekarang menjadi bisnis dua belas miliar dolar yang tidak hanya merugikan individu dan keluarga mereka sendiri tetapi membuat ekonomi menderita dengan menguras miliaran. dolar dari Amerika Serikat dan berfungsi sebagai mobil untuk pencucian uang." Ada banyak poin menarik di sini. Untuk memulainya, kita hanya memiliki sedikit salah arah tentang Jack Abramoff dan pengabaiannya terhadap proses legislatif. Komentar ini, dan lain-lain yang dibuat, mengikuti logika bahwa; 

1) Jack Abramoff menentang RUU ini, 2) Jack Abramoff korup, 3) untuk menghindari korupsi, Anda harus memilih RUU ini. Itu jelas tidak masuk akal. Jika kita mengikuti logika ini secara ekstrem, kita harus mengembalikan dan membatalkan tagihan apa pun yang didukung Abramoff, dan memberlakukan tagihan apa pun yang ditentangnya, terlepas dari isi RUU itu. Perundang-undangan harus benar-benar disahkan, atau tidak, berdasarkan keunggulan undang-undang yang diusulkan, bukan berdasarkan kedudukan satu orang. Juga, ketika Jack Abramoff menentang tagihan sebelumnya, dia melakukannya atas nama kliennya eLottery, berusaha agar penjualan tiket lotre di internet dikecualikan dari undang-undang. Ironisnya, perlindungan yang dia cari termasuk dalam undang-undang baru ini, karena lotere yang dikelola negara dapat dikecualikan. Oleh karena itu Jack Abramoff mungkin akan mendukung undang-undang ini karena undang-undang itu menawarkan apa yang dia cari. Itu tidak akan menghentikan Goodlatte dan yang lainnya dari menggunakan aib Abramoff baru-baru ini sebagai cara yang efektif untuk membuat tagihan mereka terlihat lebih baik, sehingga menjadikannya bukan hanya tagihan anti-perjudian, tetapi entah bagaimana juga RUU antikorupsi, sekaligus memberi penghargaan kepada Abramoff dan kliennya. Selanjutnya, adalah pernyataannya bahwa perjudian online "menyakiti individu dan keluarganya" ;. 

daftar bet138 Saya berasumsi bahwa apa yang dia bicarakan di sini adalah masalah perjudian. Mari kita luruskan rekornya. Hanya sebagian kecil penjudi yang menjadi penjudi bermasalah, bukan hanya sebagian kecil dari populasi, tetapi hanya sebagian kecil penjudi. Selain itu, Goodlatte dapat membuat Anda percaya bahwa perjudian internet lebih membuat ketagihan daripada perjudian kasino. Senator Kyl telah melangkah lebih jauh dengan menyebut perjudian online sebagai "kokain dari perjudian", menghubungkan kutipan tersebut dengan beberapa peneliti yang tidak disebutkan namanya. Sebaliknya, para peneliti menunjukkan bahwa berjudi di Internet dapat membuat Anda melupakan kecanduan daripada berjudi di kasino. Faktanya, mesin judi elektronik, di kasino dan trek balap di seluruh negeri jauh lebih membuat ketagihan daripada judi online. Dalam penelitian oleh N. Dowling, D. Smith dan T. Thomas di School of Health Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora, Australia “Ada pandangan luas bahwa permainan elektronik adalah bentuk perjudian yang paling 'membuat ketagihan', karena memberikan kontribusi lebih menyebabkan masalah perjudian daripada setiap aktivitas perjudian lainnya. Dengan demikian, mesin permainan elektronik sekarang disebut 'crack-kokain' perjudian" ;.

Bond Investment : Existing Connection Chaos.

 Most investors tend to allocate a certain amount to "bonds" and then ignore them. Many genuinely believe that little ever happens in the bond market and an attachment is really a bond. Investors often genuinely believe that an attachment portfolio is typically pretty stable/safe and doesn't need just as much time and attention and "analysis" as the stock portion of their portfolio. Besides, bonds are kind of complicated and hard to determine for several investors. There were some interesting and unprecedented things going on in the bond market over the past month or two that merit investor's full attention. This all started with the sub-prime mortgage meltdown and has quickly spread to numerous other places in the credit markets. Many bonds are currently unattractive as investments. It is a great time for investors to review just how much of their portfolio they've dedicated to bonds and what they own in their bond portfolios.

Three extremely unusual bond market facts recently:

1. 10-year Treasury bond yields are currently below the inflation rate (cpi). Very rare.

2. Some inflation protected bond yields have gone negative. Never happened before.

3. Tax-free municipal bond yields have already been above taxable Treasury bond yields.

US Treasury Bonds

Top quality bonds like US treasury bonds have inked very well as investors have had a "flight to quality" in the markets. It has made these top quality bonds less attractive investments looking forward within my opinion. Bond prices relocate the opposite direction of interest rates, and long-term (10 year) bonds are much more volatile (risky) to changes in interest rates (up and down) than short-term (1-2 year) bonds. Investors have sold riskier bonds in the recent credit market panic and rushed into US treasury bonds pushing these bond prices up, and pushing the interest rate (yields) on these bonds down to surprisingly low levels. Right now 2 year treasury bonds are yielding just about 1.6%, and 10 year treasury bonds are yielding just about 3.5%. After taxes and inflation these "safe" bonds will probably end up in negative real returns for investors (after adjusting for inflation). Do you really want to lock in negative real after-tax returns over the next 2-10 years in your portfolio? I don't. In general interest income on bonds is taxable as "ordinary income" at the bigger federal tax rates up to 35% (US Treasury bonds aren't taxed at the state level). The after-tax return of a 10-year treasury bond is estimated at 3.5% * (1-.35) = 2.27% per year. In the event that you subtract the recent inflation rate of around 3% you get an estimated real after-tax return of -.7% per year. The real after-tax return on 2-year treasury bonds is all about -1.9% (assuming 3% inflation). That is unlikely to satisfy many people's investment goals and retirement dreams. These "safe" investments in US treasury bonds that investors have rushed into over the past month or two don't really look so nice looking forward. Investors have obtained them as a safe temporary hiding place since riskier bonds and stocks have all been declining in value recently. I believe cash/money market funds will probably provide better returns than US treasury bonds over the next year, with less interest rate risk. I also think stocks can provide much better returns than US treasury bonds over the next few years.

Inflation and Bonds

Rising inflation may be the #1 enemy of bond investments. Most bonds are "fixed" income investments that provide exactly the same dollar value of interest income annually (and they are not adjusted upwards for inflation). Rising inflation also will end up in higher interest rates, that causes bond prices to decline (remember bond prices and interest rates relocate opposite directions). There are many signs that inflation is increasing in the USA. The price tag on oil has shot up to new record degrees of $100+ per barrel over the past few months. Other commodity prices such as for instance wheat, corn, gold, and iron ore have spiked as well over the past year. The price tag on things such as for instance healthcare, college education, and food continue to improve as well. The "headline" consumer price index (cpi) has risen 4.3% over the past 12 months (as of January), but excluding oil and food it's been up 2.7%. The government's recent actions to cut short-term interest rates, increase the amount of money supply, and provide fiscal stimulus (rebates) to the economy typically lead to higher expected future inflation (and interest rates). The US dollar has weakened significantly over the past year in accordance with other currencies. A weaker US dollar is also inflationary as goods imported into the US cost more in dollars.

How about TIPS (US Treasury inflation protected bonds)?

If inflation is picking up shouldn't we buy TIPS? Inflation protected bonds have performed very well recently as well because of the rush to the safety/liquidity of US treasury bonds of all types (regular and inflation-protected) and the increased concerns about rising inflation. This stampede has resulted in record low interest rates on TIPS as well, making them look less attractive. TIPS provide a certain annual (real) yield above the official inflation rate (cpi). This real or after-inflation yield is locked in once you buy, and at this time it's very small. On many TIPS bonds the interest rate has fallen to about zero (and some have amazingly dropped to slightly below zero), compared for their historical yields of around 2.0%. Negative interest rates on TIPS bonds never happened before. Lots of people believe that the inflation measure used by the us government for TIPS bonds (cpi) understates the true inflation rate in the economy. If inflation is headed to 4%-5%+ TIPS will significantly outperform most other kinds of bonds (which will probably incur losses). premium bonds UK invest

The US economy and Treasury bond investments

If the economy falls into a hard recession over the next 6 months interest rates could go still lower, resulting in gains in treasury bond prices from current levels. That (recession) may be the scenario that is necessary to produce profit treasury bonds over the next 6 months. The US economy happens to be very near or in a recession right now.